![]() ![]() If not, the width or height will remain at 200px. The rest of the CSS is identical.įor each one, if the CSS is successful, the width and height of the image or span will be reduced to 100px. In each pair, the first one uses display: block and the second one uses display: table-cell. In the simplified demo, there's a pair of images and a pair of span tags with a blue background. Both can be removed from the equation for the time being, in the interest of reducing the code to the simplest state in which the underlying problem can still be reproduced. It also has nothing to do with aligning the content (although that's presumably the motivation for using display: table-cell). It has nothing to do with the container being resizable. Table cells behave differently in this case than an element with display: block. It's caused by using display: table-cell in combination with max-width: 100% and max-height: 100%. The problem occurs in IE, Firefox, and Opera. I know it's possible to scale the image dynamically in javascript, but I don't see the need for extra javascript, when Internet Explorer should be able to handle the scaling correctly. I can get IE to scale the width, similar to Chrome/Safari, but it requires the DIV height (yes, height) to be set to something low, like 10px, which is kindda weird imo. The width will not go below 100%, which is the main issue. Internet Explorer 10 however, only scales the height. Try resizing the box to less than 100% width and height in Chrome and you will get something similar to these images: ![]() ![]() I've set up a quick jsfiddle to illustrate the issue. Chrome and Safari does this perfectly - Internet Explorer 10 doesn't. The image must also be centered, both horizontally and vertically. The image must retain its proportions and never go beyond 100% (both width and height) - even if the containing DIV is larger than the image. Passed to the wrapper element.I'm trying fit a fluid image inside a resizable DIV. When prop is an array it has to be combined with media keys, allows for art directing fluid images.įading duration is set up to 500ms by default When prop is an array it has to be combined with media keys, allows for art directing fixed images.ĭata returned from the fluid query. gatsby-image props Nameĭata returned from the fixed query. While you could achieve a similar effect with plain CSS media queries, gatsby-image accomplishes this using the tag, which ensures that browsers only download the image they need for a given breakpoint. Installĭepending on the gatsby starter you used, you may need to include gatsby-transformer-sharp and gatsby-plugin-sharp as well, and make sure they are installed and included in your gatsby-config. The gatsby-image component automatically sets up the “blur-up”Įffect as well as lazy loading of images further down the screen. The GraphQL query creates multiple thumbnails with optimized JPEG and PNGĬompression. Which specify the fields needed by gatsby-image. Write a GraphQL query using one of the included GraphQL “fragments”.Import gatsby-image and use it in place of the built-in img.Processing capabilities powered by GraphQL and Sharp. Gatsby-image is designed to work seamlessly with Gatsby’s native image With Gatsby, we can make images way way better. Optimized images should be easy and the default. Most solutions involve a lot of manual labor and bookkeeping to ensure every Or a design-tweak shaves 100px of width off your images. Optimize your images and then… several images are swapped in at the last minute Hold the image position so your page doesn’t jump while images load.ĭoing this consistently across a site feels like a task that can never be completed.Show a preview of the image while it loads. Efficiently lazy load images to speed initial page load and save bandwidth.Strip all unnecessary metadata and optimize JPEG and PNG compression. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |